Proto-mahjong › Chinese classical › Babcock rules › Western / British Empire style
Western / British Empire style
Sources
The documents this entry rests on, as published. Each can be opened and checked; nothing in this part is anybody’s reading of them.
Guide Sloper, Tom. "FAQ 2b: Identifying a Mah-Jongg Variant." Sloperama. canonical checked 2026-09-18
https://www.sloperama.com/mjfaq/mjfaq02b.html
chart’s note Tile counts, hand sizes, flower handling and scoring for roughly 50 named variants. Primary source for most leaf nodes in this chart.
for this variant The chart's canonical source, read 2026-09-18; its rules entry was unchanged on 2026-10-09. Kajongg, the u3a adviser and Iversen's page now confirm independently the rule shape it gives: 20 for going out, points then doubles, settlement among all players
Also cited on: Chinese archaic, Late Qing style, Chinese pre-classical, Chinese classical, Shanghai / Hong Kong new style, Hong Kong old style and 45 more · bibliography #1
Guide Sloper, Tom. "FAQ 3: Books About Mah-Jongg." cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://sloperama.com/mjfaq/mjfaq03.html
chart’s note Identifies Perlmen & Chan in full and lists the other Hong Kong Old Style books: Constantino, Li, Tsui, Lo.
for this variant Same author as the chart's source, so not independent, but it is the best map of the style's books and the main lead for citation chasing. It dates a Western-style rule book in New Zealand to 1941 at the latest and records the British one-chow limit. Its overview contradicts FAQ 2b by filing Headley & Seeley and Pritchard under Chinese Classical
Also cited on: Sichuan 72-tile game, WMPA / WMF, Wright-Patterson, AMJA card · bibliography #34
Guide Sloper, Tom. "Weekly Mah-Jong" column 396: "British/Western Mah-Jong." Sloperama, 8 March 2009. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://www.sloperama.com/mahjongg/column396b.html
AI summary Written before his visit to Mumbai, from what his hosts had told him: their game is always four rounds, listed as four sets and a pair, special hands, clean pungs-only hands and dealer's choice, with pictures of the round-two special hands. He still calls it British/Western here.
for this variant Same author as the chart's source, so not independent. It shows that the India/Mumbai child began in Sloper's writing as British/Western play, before column 399 split it off. Its link labelled Max Robertson's leads to Iversen's page, which does not name Robertson
Also cited on: India / Mumbai style · bibliography #337
Encyclopedia Mahjong Wiki. "Jewel Dragons" (patterns:jewel-dragons). mahjong.wikidot.com. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
http://mahjong.wikidot.com/patterns:jewel-dragons
AI summary The wiki's page on the Pearl, Jade and Ruby Dragon hands, each a set of pungs in one suit with the matching dragon. It says they come from Western rulesets, especially those influenced by British Mahjong, and marks them as never used in Chinese Classical.
for this variant Same wiki as the chart's citation 32, so not independent, and it gives no source. It credits a family of hands to British play and keeps it out of Chinese Classical, which supports a separate British style; it fits the Jewel Hands in Sloper's column 396
Only cited here · bibliography #373
Commercial KDE Documentation. "Game rules." The Kajongg Handbook. docs.kde.org (KDE Frameworks 6 edition). cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://docs.kde.org/stable_kf6/en/kajongg/kajongg/gamerules.html
AI summary The help page of Kajongg, a free four-player mahjong program. It says the program supports two Classical Chinese variants, as played in Germany and in Great Britain, and outlines the scoring: base points, then doubles, then settlement between all players.
for this variant Independent of Sloper: a working program whose scoring matches FAQ 2b's 20 for going out, points then doubles and settlement among all players. It calls the British game Classical Chinese, not Western
Only cited here · bibliography #375
Commercial Rohdewald, Wolfgang. predefined.py, Kajongg source code: the built-in rulesets Classical Chinese standard, Classical Chinese DMJL and Classical Chinese BMJA. KDE GitLab, games/kajongg, master branch. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://invent.kde.org/games/kajongg/-/raw/master/src/predefined.py
AI summary The program's built-in rulesets, written as code. The BMJA class, described as Classical Chinese as defined by the British Mah-Jong Association, allows one chow and sets the limit at 1000. It also requires a calling declaration and adds hands such as Knitting, Triple Knitting, Wriggling Snake and Gates of Heaven.
for this variant Independent of Sloper and the most detailed BMJA rules read. Its one-chow limit and Knitting hands match FAQ 3's account of Headley & Seeley and the u3a adviser. Its 1000-point limit is the one on Iversen's page
Only cited here · bibliography #377
Guide u3a (Third Age Trust). "Mah-jong." Subject advice page by the national subject adviser (Martin). u3a.org.uk, members area. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://www.u3a.org.uk/members-area/subjects/mah-jong
AI summary The UK u3a adviser's page for mah-jong groups. The adviser plays and teaches BMJA rules, notes that the BMJA allows only one chow and has chosen 19 special hands, and says other groups vary, mostly in their special hands.
for this variant Independent of Sloper: a current UK source in which BMJA rules are the reference for British club play, with one chow per hand. Its 19 special hands are far fewer than FAQ 2b's 70-80, which Sloper says vary from book to book
Only cited here · bibliography #378
Guide Iversen, Morten. "Mah Jongg as we play it!" Duckie's Mah Jongg Page (hands), w1.1332.telia.com, captures 1999-2012. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://web.archive.org/web/20080509064218/http://w1.1332.telia.com/~u133200063/
AI summary A dead personal page with pictures of one group's scoring hands, from Half Limit (500) to Double Limit (2000). It includes Knitting, Gertie's Garter, Greta's Garden and Wriggling Snake. Sloper's column 396 links it as "Max Robertson's Western scoring", but the pages read never name Robertson. Read through the Wayback Machine capture of 9 May 2008.
for this variant Independent of Sloper, though he links to it. It shows the one-chow rule, the Gertie's Garter and Greta's Garden that column 396 names for British/Western play, and the 1000-point limit of Kajongg's BMJA ruleset. A personal page, read in a 2008 Wayback capture
Only cited here · bibliography #380
Guide Iversen, Morten. "The Scoring System." Duckie's Mah Jongg Page, w1.1332.telia.com, captured 6 February 2002. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://web.archive.org/web/20020206153732/http://w1.1332.telia.com:80/~u133200063/scoring.htm
AI summary The same site's scoring table: points for each meld, 20 for going Mah Jongg, then doubles. It also sets out the pay-off, in which the winner is paid by all and the others settle their differences. Read through the Wayback Machine.
for this variant Independent of Sloper: the points-then-doubles count, with 20 for going out and settlement among all players, that FAQ 2b gives for Western/British. The site's main page says these are only the rules its group plays
Only cited here · bibliography #381
Encyclopedia Wikipedia. "Mahjong." cross-check checked 2026-09-18
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong
AI summary The main article's regional-variations section, which describes most branches of this tree independently of the chart's own sources.
for this variant Independent of Sloper but uncited. It is the only source read that ties Western classical to Babcock, and it makes the term mean mainly the American Wright-Patterson rules. The same article files Millington's British book under Chinese classical
Also cited on: Proto-mahjong, Chinese classical, Hong Kong old style, Taiwanese style, Nanyang variants, Singapore style and 10 more · bibliography #54
Encyclopedia Mahjong Wiki. "Family Tree and Timeline." mahjong.wikidot.com. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
chart’s note The decade-by-decade timeline and the branch structure this chart follows, including the caveat that each variant's evolution has been cross-cultural.
for this variant The source of the chart's note on All Pairs and All Green, so not independent of the chart. It treats the BMJA rules as a ruleset of their own, which the chart does not carry. It cites nothing
Also cited on: Chinese classical, Shanghai / Hong Kong new style, Hong Kong Taiwanese, Nanyang variants, Mainland regionals, Korean traditional · bibliography #7
Encyclopedia Wikipedia. "Gwyn Headley." cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwyn_Headley
AI summary A biography of the British writer and publisher. Its Mah-Jong section names him President of the British Mah-Jong Association and co-author, with Yvonne Seeley, of Know the Game: Mah-Jong (1977), which it calls the standard rule book in Britain and the Commonwealth.
for this variant Independent of Sloper. It confirms that British play has its own association and a standard rule book used across the Commonwealth, the node's British Empire extent. Library catalogues date the first edition to 1978, not 1977. It does not call the game Western
Only cited here · bibliography #374
Commercial KDE Documentation. "Bibliography." Appendix to The Kajongg Handbook. docs.kde.org (KDE Frameworks 6 edition). cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://docs.kde.org/stable_kf6/en/kajongg/kajongg/bibliography.html
AI summary The handbook's reading list. It recommends Millington (1977) for Classical Chinese as played in the West, and Headley and Seeley's Mah-Jong (3rd edition, 2008) for the rules used in Great Britain as the BMJA defines them.
for this variant Independent of Sloper. It ties the BMJA ruleset to Headley and Seeley's book, as Wikipedia and MICRO-80 do. Like Wikipedia, it files Millington under Classical Chinese rather than a Western style
Only cited here · bibliography #376
Journalism Grigonis, Ed. "Notes from the Software Editor." MICRO-80 (Adelaide) vol. 4 no. 6, January 1984. cross-check checked 2026-10-09
https://archive.org/details/micro_80-vol_04-issue_06-1984_01
AI summary The software editor's column in an Australian home-computer magazine. Among the programs he wants, he asks for a Mah-Jong scorer or player that follows the British Mah-Jong Association's rules in Know the Game: Mah-Jong: "Sorry, no American rules." Another Internet Archive copy (MICRO-80_Vol._4_Issue_06_1984-01_MICRO-80_AU) has the same text, but its OCR contains stray angle brackets.
for this variant Independent of Sloper and written at the time. It shows that in Australia in 1984 the BMJA book was the expected standard and American rules were something else. That supports the node's British Empire extent and the chart's separation of this style from the American line
Only cited here · bibliography #379
Rulebook British Mahjong scoring, as tabulated on the wiki's own Western Mah Jong page. supporting
http://mahjong.wikidot.com/rules:western-mah-jong-scoring
chart’s note The wiki attributes All Green, Seven Pairs and the Jewel Dragons to this tradition flowing back into Chinese rulesets. No book is named. The page has since been removed from the live wiki and the Wayback Machine holds no capture of it, so this citation can no longer be checked at source.
Only cited here · bibliography #32
Analysis
Written by an AI model from the sources above. It is a reading of them, not a source in its own right: every figure in it points back to a numbered source, and where the two disagree, the source is right.
Assessment
- Confidence
- documented a published ruleset or rule description exists and is cited
- Evidence
- corroborated two or more independent sources agree on the facts that define this variant
Cross-comparison
What each source was read to say, set side by side. The numbers are the sources above.
| Source | Tiles | Hand | Flowers | Scoring | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | 144 or more (jokers optional and variable in number) | 13, out on 14 | melded instantly when received | 20 for Out, then points for pongs/kongs/pairs, then double | all players earn points |
| [1] | 144 or more; jokers optional and may vary in number | 13 in hand, out on 14; many special hands (70-80) that vary slightly from book to book | Melded instantly when received | 20 points for Out, then points for pongs, kongs and pairs, then double | All players earn points, not only the winner |
| [2] | — | Headley & Seeley's British book limits a hand to one chow and uses Western hands such as Knitting | — | — | — |
| [3] | — | Special hands of the British/Western round named as Gate Hands, Snake Hands, Jewel Hands, Unique Wonders (13 Orphans), Crochet (Knitting), Gertie's Garter, Greta's Garden and Dragon & Pairs | — | — | — |
| [4] | — | Pearl, Jade and Ruby Dragon: pungs of one suit with the matching dragons | — | — | — |
| [5] | — | — | — | Base points first (2 for a simple exposed pung, 20 for winning), then doubles (one for a meld of dragons) | Differences are paid between all players; the winner is paid her full score by the other three; East pays and receives double |
| [6] | — | At most one chow. Knitting (7 pairs in two suits, no honours) and Triple Knitting score half the limit, and Wriggling Snake and Gates of Heaven the full limit. Thirteen Orphans is called the 13 Unique Wonders | — | Limit 1000 points; a calling hand must be declared; Original Call scores one double; All Flowers and All Seasons score two doubles | — |
| [7] | — | Four sets and a pair, or one of the BMJA's 19 special hands; the BMJA allows only one chow | — | — | — |
| [8] | — | Standard hand of four pungs, kongs or chows (at most one chow) and a pair; a concealed hand may have any number of chows. Hands are graded Half Limit (500), Limit (1000) and Double Limit (2000), among them Knitting, Triple Knitting, Gertie's Garter, Greta's Garden, Wriggling Snake, Imperial Jade and Thirteen Grades of Imperial Treasure | — | — | — |
| [9] | — | — | — | Exposed pungs of 2-8 score 2 (concealed 4); terminal and honour pungs score double that, and kongs four times as much. Going Mah Jongg scores 20. Doubles come for dragon and wind pungs, own flower, no chows, one suit with honours and others | The winner rounds the score to the nearest 100 and is paid that by each player; the other three pay one another the differences; the wind of the round pays and receives double |
- [1] 70-80 special hands varying book to book; optional Charleston or Razzle exchange, and a Goulash after a drawn game. Sloperama calls this 'Vanilla Western' and suggests 'British Empire style' as the better name; played in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India and Italy
- [10] PARENTAGE TENSION: calls Western classical a descendant of the version Babcock introduced, which matches the chart, but then says the term today largely refers to the Wright-Patterson rules used in the US military. The chart makes Wright-Patterson a child of this node rather than a synonym for it
- [1] Re-read 2026-10-09; the rules are unchanged since 2026-09-18. An optional Charleston or Razzle before each turn and a Goulash after a drawn game. Books named: Strauser & Evans, Thompson & Maloney, Whitney, Carkner, Robertson, Pritchard, Glass, Headley & Seeley, with McKeithan added in the overview list. In that overview Millington appears only under Chinese Classical, while Headley & Seeley and Pritchard appear under both Chinese Classical and Western/British Empire. Played in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India and Italy. Sloper once called it Vanilla Western and now suggests British Empire style. The page also says some authorities call it American, and that other 1920s authors wrote down the Chinese Classical rules without Babcock's simplifications
- [2] Headley & Seeley's Know the Game: Mah-Jong (A & C Black, 1994; 2nd edition 2002) was produced with the British Mah-Jong Association. It describes a variant of the Western game, with the Goulash and rules for home and tournament play. Max Robertson's The Game of Mahjong (Whitcoulls, New Zealand, 1974; Stanwick's list adds Whitcombe and Tombs editions of 1941, the 5th, and 1968, the 24th) describes Western-style rules used in English-speaking countries outside North America. Pritchard's Teach Yourself Mahjong (2001) describes the Western game. The De La Rue Pocket Guide to Mah Jong, Containing the Standard Laws (London, 1924), like every 1920s book except Babcock's, describes Classic Chinese rules. The overview at the foot of the page lists Headley & Seeley and Pritchard under Chinese Classical, and gives Western as Strauser & Evans, Thompson & Maloney, Whitney, Carkner and Robertson
- [3] Written 8 March 2009, before Sloper's visit to Mumbai, from what his hosts had told him; he calls their game British ("Western") mah-jong. The column ends with links to sites describing Western rules, noting that every author's description varies. One link is labelled Max Robertson's Western scoring and another the Royal Australian Navy version
- [11] The home page's loose family tree, which starts from Chinese Classical, names Western Mah Jong and lists Wright-Pat, Pusser's Bones and BMJA among the later rulesets. It says most modern rulesets except the Mainland ones use All Pairs and All Green, which came from Western Mah Jong. The wiki's Western scoring page (chart citation 32) answered 404 on 2026-10-09, and its page list has no Western page
- [4] Says the Jewel Dragons come from Western rulesets, particularly those influenced by British Mahjong. They are infrequent in Hong Kong Old Style, and the page's table marks them as never used in Chinese Classical
- [10] Re-read 2026-10-09. Western classical mahjong descends from the version Babcock introduced to America in the 1920s, and today the term largely means the Wright-Patterson rules used in the US military and similar American variants. Elsewhere the article says that in the United Kingdom Alan D. Millington revived the Chinese classical game of the 1920s with The Complete Book of Mah-jongg (1977). It credits Pussers bones to the Royal Australian Navy and does not mention the British Mah-Jong Association
- [12] Headley is President of the British Mah-Jong Association. With Yvonne Seeley he wrote Know the Game: Mah-Jong in 1977, first published by EP Publishing of Wakefield and now by A & C Black. It has sold over 500,000 copies and is called the standard rule book for the game in Britain and the Commonwealth
- [5] Kajongg supports two variants of Classical Chinese, one as played in Germany and one as played in Great Britain; the handbook's description fits both
- [13] Recommends Millington's The Complete Book of Mah-Jongg (1977) as the ultimate reference for Classical Chinese as played in the Western world, and Headley and Seeley's Mah-Jong (3rd edition, A & C Black, 2008) for the rules used in Great Britain as the BMJA defines them
- [6] The BMJA ruleset is described as Classical Chinese as defined by the British Mah-Jong Association. It is built as a modification of the program's Classical Chinese standard ruleset, alongside a German DMJL one
- [7] The adviser plays and teaches BMJA rules and says groups differ, mostly in their special hands; he has seen a website listing 100. Players must agree which rules and special hands they are using before they start
- [14] The software editor of the Adelaide magazine asks readers for a Mah-Jong scoring or playing program that follows all the rules of the British Mah-Jong Association as given in Know the Game: Mah-Jong, published by EP Publishing with the BMJA, and adds "Sorry, no American rules"
- [8] One group's own list of scoring hands, titled Mah Jongg as we play it!, with pictures
Reading it
Sloperama FAQ 2b, re-read on 9 October 2026, still describes the style as a game of 144 or more tiles. Flowers are melded at once, players hold 13 tiles, going out scores 20, meld points are then doubled, all players settle, and there are many special hands. It is played in Britain, Australia, New Zealand, India and Italy. Independent sources now show the same shape. Kajongg's handbook and code score British play with base points, 20 for winning, then doubles, with differences paid among all players. They also give the BMJA's one-chow limit and Knitting hands. Iversen's dead group page and the u3a adviser show the same one-chow rule. Wikipedia's Headley article calls the British Mah-Jong Association's Know the Game book the standard in Britain and the Commonwealth, and a 1984 Adelaide magazine expected BMJA rules and "no American rules". The sources disagree on the name and the parentage. Kajongg, Wikipedia (on Millington) and the overview in Sloper's FAQ 3 call British play Classical Chinese. Only one uncited sentence in Wikipedia ties "Western classical" to Babcock, and that sentence says the term now means Wright-Patterson. Still wanted: the BMJA book itself, Robertson's New Zealand rule book (5th edition 1941), Millington, and De La Rue's 1924 Standard Laws.
Looked for, not found
- Tournament rules FAQ 3 says Headley and Seeley's BMJA book includes tournament rules; it is wanted under official-rules. Web searches for BMJA tournaments on 2026-10-09 found none, only university societies playing other rulesets
- Law No statute or regulator names the British/Western home game. Not searched in the statute databases, which cover Asian jurisdictions where other styles are played
- Forum Not searched: Reddit and BoardGameGeek refuse automated readers, and the rec.games.mahjong archives were not attempted within the lean budget
- Organisation Web searches on 2026-10-09 found no website of the British Mah-Jong Association. It is known here only through its book, Wikipedia's Headley article, the u3a page, Kajongg and MICRO-80
- Collection Not searched: no museum or library record of a British-rules set or booklet was looked for. FAQ 3's list of 1920s British booklets (De La Rue, Chad Valley) comes from Michael Stanwick's collection
Known, not yet read
Sources that look worth having but could not be read for this entry. If you can reach one, it can be read and added. Every variant’s list is gathered on Missing sources.
- Official rules Headley, Gwyn, and Yvonne Seeley (later See). Mah-Jong (Know the Game). EP Publishing, 1978; A & C Black 1984, 1994, 2002, 2008; Bloomsbury 2019, ISBN 9781472970091. Written with and endorsed by the British Mah-Jong Association — The BMJA's own rules, called the standard rule book in Britain and the Commonwealth; it would settle the special hands, the one-chow limit, the Goulash and the tournament rules at first hand
Where: Internet Archive lending items mahjong0000head (A & C Black, 1984) and mahjong0000unse (1994); libraries; in print from Bloomsbury. Tried: 2026-10-09: IA metadata marks both items access-restricted, and their djvu.txt files answered 403 and 401. That is IA's own lending restriction; they can be borrowed by hand with an account - Rulebook Robertson, Max. The Game of Mah Jong. Whitcombe and Tombs, New Zealand (5th edition 1941, 24th edition 1968); Whitcoulls 1974 and 1981; Penguin NZ 2007, ISBN 9780143006596 — FAQ 3 calls it a Western-style rule book used in English-speaking countries outside North America. Its fifth edition of 1941 is the earliest dated Commonwealth Western-style rule book found, and the first edition's date is unknown
Where: National Library of New Zealand, Trove-listed Australian libraries, second-hand booksellers. Tried: 2026-10-09: web search found only booksellers' listings; it is not on the Internet Archive. Papers Past and Trove were not reachable by script - Rulebook Millington, A. D. The Complete Book of Mah-Jongg. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 1977 (later paperbacks to 2003) — The main British rule book of the period. Wikipedia and Kajongg call it Classical Chinese and FAQ 3 calls it Classical Chinese as played in the West; reading it would show whether British play is a Western style or the 1920s Classical game, and its history chapter covers the Babcock question
Where: Libraries; second-hand. Tried: 2026-10-09: an Internet Archive search by title and creator found no copy - Rulebook Pritchard, D. B. Play and Win Mah-Jong. Teach Yourself, London, 2013 (descended from Teach Yourself Mahjong, 2001, revised by Gareth Saunders) — FAQ 3 says it describes the Western game, while FAQ 3's overview files it under Chinese Classical; a British rule text either way
Where: Internet Archive lending item playwinmahjong0000prit. Tried: 2026-10-09: djvu.txt answered 401 and the item is access-restricted (IA's own lending restriction). Gareth Saunders' page on the book answered its own 403 (nginx) - Historical The Pocket Guide to Mah Jong, Containing the Standard Laws. Thomas De La Rue & Co., London, 1924 — A British code of laws from the 1920s craze. Sloper says it, like every 1920s book except Babcock's, gives Classic Chinese rules; it would show what British play descended from
Where: A PDF used to be on Gareth Saunders' site (garethjmsaunders.co.uk); Michael Stanwick's collection; the British Library. Tried: 2026-10-09: garethjmsaunders.co.uk answered its own 403 (nginx). A Wayback CDX search of the domain showed mah-jong posts but no PDF of the booklet among the matched URLs - Scholarship Rep, Jelte. The Great Mahjong Book: History, Lore and Play. Tuttle, 2007 — A collector's history whose OCR snippet says the British Mah-Jong Association guards the regulations; it may date the BMJA and trace British rules
Where: Internet Archive lending item greatmahjongbook0000repj. Tried: 2026-10-09: djvu.txt answered 401 and the item is access-restricted (IA's own lending restriction) - Journalism The Hong Konger. Article on mahjong's growing popularity in the UK, 14 April 2025. hongkonger.world/2025/04/14/mahjong-gains-popularity-uk-cultures/ — A search summary says it claims Queen Club Rules spread across the British Empire in the 1930s. That claim is unverified and bears on the node's British Empire extent
Where: https://hongkonger.world/2025/04/14/mahjong-gains-popularity-uk-cultures/. Tried: 2026-10-09: the site's Cloudflare returned its own block page (403, "Sorry, you have been blocked") - Commercial Masters Traditional Games. "The Rules of Mah Jong (Mahjong)." mastersofgames.com/rules/mah-jong-rules.htm — A British games retailer's rules page that, by search summaries, gives Chinese and British versions; a further independent account of British scoring
Where: https://www.mastersofgames.com/rules/mah-jong-rules.htm. Tried: 2026-10-09: the site answered with its own Cloudflare managed challenge (403, cf-mitigated: challenge). Not bypassed, and no archived copy was used
Where it was searched
Every place the search checklist names for this variant’s languages, and what each gave, including nothing. The last full pass was on 2026-10-09.
Names searched: English Western / British Empire style, British Empire style, Western/British, Western/British/Australian, Vanilla Western, Western Classical, Western classical mahjong, Western Mah Jong, Western-style mah-jongg, British mah-jong, British Mahjong, British rules, BMJA rules, Classical Chinese BMJA.
16 places searched
- General web search — 2026-10-09, standard mode only (extended not used). Queries: "British Mah-Jong Association" rules; "Western classical" mahjong with British points, doubles and special hands; BMJA "Know the Game"; Gwyn Headley and Yvonne Seeley; the BMJA's own website; Max Robertson Western scoring; BMJA with Headley in newspapers. They found the u3a adviser's page, the Kajongg handbook, Wikipedia's Gwyn Headley and Sloper's column 396, all read. Unreadable: mastersofgames.com rules (Cloudflare) and The Hong Konger, April 2025 (Cloudflare block), both wanted. Readable leads left unread: mahjongbritishrules.gumroad.com and its Zazzle store (an independent author selling Know the Game corrections and BMJA guides), the City Lit course page An introduction to Mah Jong, Sloper's Shanghai: Second Dynasty manual chapter on Western Mah-Jongg (sloperama.com/shanghai/Images/mjwest.htm, same author), Sloper column 392, and booksellers' listings of Robertson (Penguin NZ, 2007) and Headley and See (Bloomsbury, 2019, ISBN 9781472970091). No BMJA website turned up. A Papers Past hit concerned an unrelated Lord Headley
- Wikidata — 2026-10-09. wbsearchentities for "Western classical mahjong" returned no item. Later searches for "British mahjong" and "Western mahjong" answered 429 (too many requests, shared address) twice, 20 seconds apart. No item for this style is known; the general Mahjong item covers it
- Wikipedia, in every declared language — 2026-10-09, en only, through the API. Mahjong was re-read and Gwyn Headley read. An en search for "British Mah-Jong Association" returned only Gwyn Headley. There is no standalone article on Western or British mahjong. The Mahjong article's Western classical sentence has no citation; the Headley article cites the A & C Black 2008 edition. Further API calls answered 429 (rate limit)
- The sources' own references, and who cites them — One round, backward. From FAQ 2b and FAQ 3: the Western book list (Strauser & Evans, Thompson & Maloney, Whitney, Carkner, Robertson, Pritchard, Glass, Headley & Seeley, McKeithan) and Stanwick's list of 1920s booklets. From column 396: Iversen's page (read) and the RAN version (gunplot, already in the bibliography). From Kajongg's bibliography: Millington and Headley & Seeley. From MICRO-80: Know the Game, EP Publishing. Second-round leads, unread: Peter Gregory, All Your Mah-Jong Questions Answered: British Rules (ISBN 9798436561370) and his website; the Chad Valley booklet Mah-Jongg, Sometimes Called Sparrow (8th edition, Harborne, March 1924); Whitney's A Mah Jong Handbook (Pan, London, 1977); Peter Arnold's The Book of Games (1985) and The Complete Book of Indoor Games (1982); Commodore Computing International, March 1988, and ASM 1988 on games using BMJA rules; British National Bibliography 1978, entry B78-22732. Forward citations not attempted: OpenAlex wants a key
- Internet Archive full-text search — 2026-10-09. The full-text search for "British Mah-Jong Association" gave 19 hits. Read: MICRO-80, January 1984 (through the copy micro_80-vol_04-issue_06-1984_01, because the other copy's OCR has stray angle brackets). Lending-restricted (djvu.txt 401/403): Headley 1984 (mahjong0000head), Mah-Jong 1994 (mahjong0000unse), Pritchard 2013 (playwinmahjong0000prit), Rep 2007 (greatmahjongbook0000repj) and British National Bibliography 1978. Commodore_Computing_International_198803 answered 500. A "Western classical" mah jong search gave nothing relevant; "British rules" "mah jong" turned up Arnold's Book of Games (1985), unread. An advanced search for mahjong titles published in London, Melbourne, Sydney, Wellington, Calcutta or Bombay found only Whitney (Pan, 1977, restricted), Pritchard and Headley; no 1920s British book with open text
- Wayback Machine — 2026-10-09, intermittent: several "Temporarily Offline" 503s and connection resets. CDX for w1.1332.telia.com/~u133200063/ listed captures from 1999 to 2012. Read the index (9 May 2008), main.htm (11 December 2002) and scoring.htm (6 February 2002); me.htm gave 404. CDX for mahjong.wikidot.com/rules:western* answered 503, so whether chart citation 32 was ever captured could not be rechecked; the live page answers 404. CDX for garethjmsaunders.co.uk lists his mah-jong posts but no copy of the 1924 De La Rue Pocket Guide PDF among the matched URLs
- Google Books — Not searched: its API answered 429 in earlier passes, and snippets would only be leads to the restricted British books already wanted
- HathiTrust full-text search — Not searched: full-text search sits behind a Cloudflare challenge, and the catalogue API needs OCLC numbers that were not in hand for Robertson or Headley
- WorldCat — Not searched; the Open Library search API was used instead as a catalogue check. It gives the first edition of Headley and Seeley as 1978 (EP Publishing) and has Robertson's book from 1981 (Whitcoulls). Leads only
- Scholarly indexes — Not searched: OpenAlex wants a key, and a parlour style like this is scarcely studied academically; the one scholarly book found (Rep 2007) came through IA and is wanted
- YouTube — Not searched: rules explainers on YouTube would add no rule text beyond the BMJA book and the sources already read, within a lean budget
- English-language forums — Not searched: Reddit and BoardGameGeek refuse automated readers, and rec.games.mahjong on Google Groups was not attempted within the budget
- Mahjong reference sites — 2026-10-09. Mahjong Wiki: rules:western-mah-jong-scoring (chart citation 32) and guessed pages (western-classical-overview, western-overview, british-overview) answered 404; the page list has no Western page. The home page and patterns:jewel-dragons were read. Sloperama: FAQ 2b, FAQ 3 and column 396 read; the Western-rules manual chapter (mjwest.htm) left unread. Both sites are tied to the chart's own citations
- App and platform listings — Not searched in the stores. Kajongg, a free KDE mahjong program with a BMJA ruleset, turned up through the web search, and its handbook and code were read. Magazines on IA (Commodore Computing International 1988, ASM 1988) mention 1980s computer games built on BMJA rules; unread leads
- English-language newspaper archives — Not searched directly: Papers Past and the British Newspaper Archive refuse automated readers, Trove's API needs a key, and Chronicling America covers the US only. The one period periodical read is MICRO-80 (Adelaide, 1984), reached through IA
- Statutes published in English — Not searched: a home and club game with no regulator. The listed statute databases cover Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Philippines, where other styles are played
In the tree
Descends from Babcock rules, as the source chart draws it.
Caveat from the source chart
All Pairs and All Green flowed backwards out of this branch into most other modern rulesets, meaning the Western / American branch fed the Chinese branch, which no tree layout shows.
Descends into
- Wright-Patterson — USAF spouses, Ohio
- India / Mumbai style — rotating round rules
- Israeli Mah-Jongg Association
- Nepalese — 11-tile winning hand
- Pusser's Bones — Royal Navy