Mahjong Compendium

Proto-mahjong Chinese classical Shanghai / Hong Kong new style Hong Kong old style Nanyang variants

Nanyang variants

descent disputed

Descends into

Caveat from the source chart

Drawn with a dashed connector in the source chart: no source establishes this descent.

Cross-comparison

unsupported — the sources checked do not carry the claim this node makes

  • [1] Sloperama catalogues the individual Southeast Asian variants but uses no grouping term 'Nanyang' and asserts no common parent for them
  • [2] the wiki's family tree is the chart's stated source for this grouping; the chart itself draws the link dashed and states that no source establishes the descent

Reading it

Sloperama catalogues each Southeast Asian variant separately and never groups them or asserts a common parent; the grouping term does not appear. This is consistent with the chart drawing the link dashed, and confirms that the grouping is an organising device rather than a sourced lineage.

Sources

  1. Sloper, Tom. "FAQ 2b: Identifying a Mah-Jongg Variant." Sloperama. supporting checked 2026-09-18

    Tile counts, hand sizes, flower handling and scoring for roughly 50 named variants. Primary source for most leaf nodes in this chart.

    https://www.sloperama.com/mjfaq/mjfaq02b.html

    Also cited on: Chinese archaic, Chinese pre-classical, Chinese classical, Shanghai / Hong Kong new style, Hong Kong old style, Modern HKOS and 43 more · bibliography #1

  2. Mahjong Wiki. "Family Tree and Timeline." mahjong.wikidot.com. canonical checked 2026-09-18

    The decade-by-decade timeline and the branch structure this chart follows, including the caveat that each variant's evolution has been cross-cultural.

    http://mahjong.wikidot.com/

    Also cited on: Chinese classical, Shanghai / Hong Kong new style, Mainland regionals, Korean traditional · bibliography #7

← back to the tree