Mahjong Compendium

Proto-mahjong Chinese classical Shanghai / Hong Kong new style Mainland regionals Shenzhen style

Shenzhen style

kongs only, poorly documented

Caveat from the source chart

Rests on a single informant report.

Cross-comparison

conflicting — sources disagree materially, or one source contradicts itself

SourceTilesHandFlowersScoringPayout
[1]unknownunknown whether 13 or 16 or another numberunknownunknownunknown
  • [1] winning hand, if Sloper recalls correctly, must be PUNGS only (no chows); from conversations with author Dragon Chang
  • [1] CONTRADICTION WITHIN ONE SOURCE: the abbreviated overview on the same page reads 'Shenzhen Style (played with KONGS - no pungs or chows - details not available at present)', while the detailed section reads 'Winning hand (if I recall correctly) must be PUNGS only (no chows)'. The chart follows the kongs wording

Reading it

The source contradicts itself on the same page: the abbreviated list says the game is played with kongs and no pungs or chows, the detailed entry says the winning hand must be pungs only, hedged with 'if I recall correctly'. The chart follows the kongs wording without flagging the conflict. Tile count, hand size, flowers, scoring and payout are all recorded as unknown.

Sources

  1. Sloper, Tom. "FAQ 2b: Identifying a Mah-Jongg Variant." Sloperama. canonical checked 2026-09-18

    Tile counts, hand sizes, flower handling and scoring for roughly 50 named variants. Primary source for most leaf nodes in this chart.

    https://www.sloperama.com/mjfaq/mjfaq02b.html

    Also cited on: Chinese archaic, Chinese pre-classical, Chinese classical, Shanghai / Hong Kong new style, Hong Kong old style, Modern HKOS and 43 more · bibliography #1

← back to the tree